<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asus Eee, Ubuntu&#8217;d</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:18:57 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gordsellar</title>
		<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/comment-page-1/#comment-32420</link>
		<dc:creator>gordsellar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gordsellar.com/?p=4541#comment-32420</guid>
		<description>Val, 

Yeah, who knows. Sadly, I don&#039;t assume any machine will be durable anymore... engineered obsolecence and all that. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Val, </p>
<p>Yeah, who knows. Sadly, I don&#8217;t assume any machine will be durable anymore&#8230; engineered obsolecence and all that. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/comment-page-1/#comment-32416</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gordsellar.com/?p=4541#comment-32416</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be interested to hear if they end up being durable and reliable. When my g4 eventually meets its end (I hope not for another two years or so) I plan to get one of these, or their descendants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to hear if they end up being durable and reliable. When my g4 eventually meets its end (I hope not for another two years or so) I plan to get one of these, or their descendants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordsellar</title>
		<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/comment-page-1/#comment-32402</link>
		<dc:creator>gordsellar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gordsellar.com/?p=4541#comment-32402</guid>
		<description>Rhesus, 

Thanks for the links... I&#039;ll get to them soonish. And again, thanks for the added info on VirtualBox. I&#039;ll try it out and it may well be the solution my girlfriend has been looking for vis a vis switching to Linux while in Korea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhesus, </p>
<p>Thanks for the links&#8230; I&#8217;ll get to them soonish. And again, thanks for the added info on VirtualBox. I&#8217;ll try it out and it may well be the solution my girlfriend has been looking for vis a vis switching to Linux while in Korea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhesus</title>
		<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/comment-page-1/#comment-32398</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gordsellar.com/?p=4541#comment-32398</guid>
		<description>VirtualBox makes a virtual machine, in which it runs any number of &quot;guest&quot; operating systems.  The guest os is installed in a regular directory on your Linux system, but when it is run it only &quot;sees&quot; the I/O made by the virtual machine.  So, if WinXP is your guest os, you basically get a full WinXP session from within Linux - it acts the same way as if it were the only os on the computer, though with some performance limitations (I&#039;m trying not to sound like an ad).  Anyway, I&#039;m using it to run Vista with no problems.

There are other programs that do this, like VMware and QEMU, but I haven&#039;t tried them out.

The Mono and .NET issue would take a lot of text to explain properly, so I&#039;ll just give you some links.  One thing, though - the leader of Mono development is Miquel de Icaza, who also leads the Gnome project.  What this means is that Mono is going to be integrated into Gnome whatever anyone else thinks about it.

If you wanted to give up Gnome, you could use KDE or Xfce, Ratpoison, or (the best) Ion3.

I&#039;m sure that&#039;s all the tedium you need for one comment.  Here&#039;re the links:

Good overview, if old (there&#039;s been no demise of Mono) -

http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/tech/0EC99FBB73788FF1CC25723E0007ADDA

The GNU perspective -

http://dotgnu.org/danger.html

Crazed advocacy -

http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/16/novell-mono-dot-net-internet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VirtualBox makes a virtual machine, in which it runs any number of &#8220;guest&#8221; operating systems.  The guest os is installed in a regular directory on your Linux system, but when it is run it only &#8220;sees&#8221; the I/O made by the virtual machine.  So, if WinXP is your guest os, you basically get a full WinXP session from within Linux &#8211; it acts the same way as if it were the only os on the computer, though with some performance limitations (I&#8217;m trying not to sound like an ad).  Anyway, I&#8217;m using it to run Vista with no problems.</p>
<p>There are other programs that do this, like VMware and QEMU, but I haven&#8217;t tried them out.</p>
<p>The Mono and .NET issue would take a lot of text to explain properly, so I&#8217;ll just give you some links.  One thing, though &#8211; the leader of Mono development is Miquel de Icaza, who also leads the Gnome project.  What this means is that Mono is going to be integrated into Gnome whatever anyone else thinks about it.</p>
<p>If you wanted to give up Gnome, you could use KDE or Xfce, Ratpoison, or (the best) Ion3.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s all the tedium you need for one comment.  Here&#8217;re the links:</p>
<p>Good overview, if old (there&#8217;s been no demise of Mono) -</p>
<p><a href="http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/tech/0EC99FBB73788FF1CC25723E0007ADDA" rel="nofollow">http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/tech/0EC99FBB73788FF1CC25723E0007ADDA</a></p>
<p>The GNU perspective -</p>
<p><a href="http://dotgnu.org/danger.html" rel="nofollow">http://dotgnu.org/danger.html</a></p>
<p>Crazed advocacy -</p>
<p><a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/16/novell-mono-dot-net-internet/" rel="nofollow">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/16/novell-mono-dot-net-internet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordsellar</title>
		<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/comment-page-1/#comment-32397</link>
		<dc:creator>gordsellar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gordsellar.com/?p=4541#comment-32397</guid>
		<description>Rhesus, 

No, the suggestions are quite welcome. I&#039;ve been thinking about using VirtualBox, actually... does it fool the Korean websites into playing nice? That&#039;s the main reason I want Windows anyway -- that, and because a few formatting issues in the Linux word processors make it necessary to do edit in word before emailing electronic submissions. 

As for the keycodes, I remapped them using a script (nice and not permanent) but I don&#039;t like it exactly... for some reason I want the up arrow and shift switched, but not the down arrow and the right arrow. (I can&#039;t see how it makes sense to anyone to set it up that way, but anyhow.) Thanks for the pointers, it&#039;d like what I&#039;d seen elsewhere. Now if only I could find a spare moment...

As for Mono -- which I&#039;d not heard about till you mentioned it -- would it cripple Mono if at some point all the Microsoft compatibility were to be abandoned? 

If license fees start getting charged for using Gnome, lots of people (especially the ones most into development) will move on to something else, won&#039;t they? Especially if those fees are going where I think they&#039;d be going. I know I&#039;d be willing to move on, assuming something usable was available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhesus, </p>
<p>No, the suggestions are quite welcome. I&#8217;ve been thinking about using VirtualBox, actually&#8230; does it fool the Korean websites into playing nice? That&#8217;s the main reason I want Windows anyway &#8212; that, and because a few formatting issues in the Linux word processors make it necessary to do edit in word before emailing electronic submissions. </p>
<p>As for the keycodes, I remapped them using a script (nice and not permanent) but I don&#8217;t like it exactly&#8230; for some reason I want the up arrow and shift switched, but not the down arrow and the right arrow. (I can&#8217;t see how it makes sense to anyone to set it up that way, but anyhow.) Thanks for the pointers, it&#8217;d like what I&#8217;d seen elsewhere. Now if only I could find a spare moment&#8230;</p>
<p>As for Mono &#8212; which I&#8217;d not heard about till you mentioned it &#8212; would it cripple Mono if at some point all the Microsoft compatibility were to be abandoned? </p>
<p>If license fees start getting charged for using Gnome, lots of people (especially the ones most into development) will move on to something else, won&#8217;t they? Especially if those fees are going where I think they&#8217;d be going. I know I&#8217;d be willing to move on, assuming something usable was available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhesus</title>
		<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/comment-page-1/#comment-32394</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gordsellar.com/?p=4541#comment-32394</guid>
		<description>sorry, one more thing - to find out how to remap keys run

$ man xmodmap

it&#039;s pretty straightforward

also, xev will help you get keycodes

...or rely on the Gnome utility, which I know nothing about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, one more thing &#8211; to find out how to remap keys run</p>
<p>$ man xmodmap</p>
<p>it&#8217;s pretty straightforward</p>
<p>also, xev will help you get keycodes</p>
<p>&#8230;or rely on the Gnome utility, which I know nothing about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhesus</title>
		<link>http://www.gordsellar.com/2008/11/22/asus-eee-ubuntud/comment-page-1/#comment-32393</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gordsellar.com/?p=4541#comment-32393</guid>
		<description>unwanted suggestion number 1:

VirtualBox is a lot nicer than dual-boot (Win. programs can work from the Linux desktop, for example).  You don&#039;t even need a separate partition.  See here:

http://www.virtualbox.org/

Totally different from Wine, and much more reliable.

And since the subject is Linux, there needs to be some snarky advocacy.  Here&#039;s mine - those who are very concerned about Open Source need to be aware of the Mono project, it&#039;s increasing integration into Gnome, and how Mono relates to Microsoft&#039;s .NET framework.  If Gnome users find themselves paying license fees in the future, it&#039;s going to be because of Mono (though Mono itself is neat).

There, that&#039;s my bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unwanted suggestion number 1:</p>
<p>VirtualBox is a lot nicer than dual-boot (Win. programs can work from the Linux desktop, for example).  You don&#8217;t even need a separate partition.  See here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.virtualbox.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualbox.org/</a></p>
<p>Totally different from Wine, and much more reliable.</p>
<p>And since the subject is Linux, there needs to be some snarky advocacy.  Here&#8217;s mine &#8211; those who are very concerned about Open Source need to be aware of the Mono project, it&#8217;s increasing integration into Gnome, and how Mono relates to Microsoft&#8217;s .NET framework.  If Gnome users find themselves paying license fees in the future, it&#8217;s going to be because of Mono (though Mono itself is neat).</p>
<p>There, that&#8217;s my bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
