‘junk’ DNA not junk?

BBC reports that it might not be. I’ve long thought the declaration of what’s not understood to be junk a little suspect, myself.

This article also is written in a way that reminds me how much like computation genetics is. Very interesting. Reminiscent of Cory Doctorow’s story “0wnz0red”, among others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *