- Readings, January/February 2026
- Readings, March/April 2026
March and April of 2026 were a little rough for reading. The ol’ work schedule is basically flat-out insane, and a lot of my spare time goes into translation work, so the fact that our son’s back in school again has helped less than I thought it might. (We lost a teacher at work and, well, nobody’s hiring anyone these days, so I’m teaching a lot more hours than I’m actually supposed to be.) Whew. Anyway…
I’m still off-and-on reading some of the same things I mentioned last time, like:
- Sir Thomas Malory’s Complete Works edited by Eugène Vinaver.
- Max Bennett’s A Brief History of Intelligence
But below the cut, I’ve only posted properly about things I’ve either finished or given up on—and the latter, only when I’ve read a significant amount of it before giving up on it.
Fiction

First up, I continued trying to read Clive Barker‘s 1991 novel Imajica. I wasn’t sure how far I’d get, because I’ve actually had the book for almost thirty years, and tried to read it several times, always giving up… and yet, as a high-schooler I actually loved other Clive Barker novels like The Great and Secret Show and Weaveworld. 1 However, for some reason, I never got very far into Imajica, and I’ve never been sure why. Anyway, I decided to give it another shot—perhaps the last try I’d be giving this book—and started reading it back in February. It’s a huge book, and I found it slow going, though it has some of what I loved so much in The Great and Secret Show and in Weaveworld: even in the early pages, there are hints of strange otherworldy places and encounters with strange otherworldly beings. That said, I found the book took quite some time to really get going, and I didn’t care so much about the characters, at least not in the first hundred pages or so. The book suffers from a sort of late-80s/early-90s need to be “cool,” I find: I think it has to do with the tone of the narration, but also the way the dialog is written, and most of all the characterization. I really, really disliked almost… no, wait, actually, not almost. I disliked all of the characters I encountered in the book. I stuck with it until about page 250, found I wasn’t engaged, and gave up on it.
It’s disappointing considering how much I liked certain other works by Barker—and I do plan to revisit some of his earlier work, like The Books of Blood and maybe Everville—but Imajica is just not for me. There was a time when I would have pushed onward, and maybe have been rewarded by it, but these days I think it’s just better for me to walk away and just say that this book ended up being not for me.
Next, I read Premee Mohamed‘s The Siege of Burning Grass. I got access to US-based Libby (as well as Kanopy and Hoopla) through a non-resident library card for the Queens Public Library earlier in March, so suddenly I had access to a lot more stuff than I had already—as well as receiving a Kindle for my birthday. (I already had one functional Kindle, actually, but it lacked a reading light so I didn’t get much use from it.) Anyway, this was the first interesting thing I saw after logging into Libby, and on the strength of The Butcher of the Forest, which I read last year, I nabbed it and began reading.
It took me a few weeks to finish, in part because the setting is extremely bleak, and in part because I was very busy with translating work. In any case, it’s the kind of novel that rewards a slow, steady read, which makes sense: I cannot imagine a book that delves as deeply into questions about war, pacifism, and violence that also rips through its narrative at a rollicking speed. But while it’s slow-going, or it was for me, it’s a rewarding read, and in many ways (and I’m sure I’m not the only one) it reminded me quite a bit of Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness—both are slow burns, both explore some heavy questions, and both are pretty unflinching about human nature while still having a very strong moral conviction underpinning them.
Though Butcher of the Forest has stuck with me a little more, I was impressed by The Siege of Burning Grass, and plan to read more of Mohamed’s work when I get a chance. (I already have the ebooks for her Beneath the Rising trilogy, thanks to a bundle deal I picked up last October, so maybe I’ll proceed on to those.)
I also read The Devourers by Indra Das. It’s a werewolf novel… well, kind of. But it’s quite different from any werewolf tale I’ve encountered before, in part because the creatures in it are not only werewolves, or rather, it’s easier to say that it includes all kinds of mythical beings as manifestations of one supernatural phenomenon, that of humanoid shapeshifters who feed on humans. Das creates a sort of backstory for essentially all mythic creatures that is compelling and logical, and also really unique.
Jumping back and forth between the modern era and seventeenth century India, the book has a number of narrator viewpoints, from Alok (a modern professor) in Kolkata, to a human woman living in the 1600s in various different settlements in the Mughal Empire, to several world-wandering, soul-devouring shape-shifters who cross paths with these humans. The book is about several things at once: it’s about violence and the violence of consumption, but also about the violence of consumption of others’ stories—which makes sense, since Das rewrote the stories in this book from earlier works that were less critical of their male-centric use of sexual and other violence against women; it’s also about liminality, about not being one thing or the other—not human, not inhuman; not (only) male and not (only) female; about being monstrous and not-monstrous at the same time… which is also to say, it’s definitely a deeply queer novel, not just because of the same-sex(-ish, in some cases) relationships that transpire within it, but also because that queerness deeply informs a lot about the supernatural elements of the novel, in particular when it comes to the shapechangers’ culture and taboos.
Anyway, I found The Devourers beautifully written and very hard to put down.
Graphic Novels
Having gained access to Hoopla, I was quick to look for anything new from Gou Tanabe, and I wasn’t disappointed. The Shadow Out of Time was published in late 2025, and is another of Gou’s faithful adaptations of H.P. Lovecraft’s fiction. The art is stupendous, really conveying the cyclopean and the unsettling in a way that I think really captures Lovecraft’s tales and aesthetic. Really, Gou manages to adapt the story at great length, expanding it to a few hundred pages, and I thought it was a really excellent treatment of the story. (Really, it was so compelling that I basically inhaled it in a couple of days, which for me is pretty fast.) If you’ve enjoyed Gou’s earlier adaptations, it’s well worth a look.
For a while, I had a copy of Barker’s Everville, the sequel to The Great and Secret Show, but never got around to it, and now I haven’t got it anymore.↩
It’s interesting reading what you thought of Barker’s various books, nearly three decades or so after I read them myself!
While I’ll never be into his horror, I was hooked after receiving “The Great and Secret Show” as a gift in my early teens, enjoying it immensely and rereading it multiple times over the following years (I even still quote it occasionally!), so I soon followed it with “Weaveworld” about which I could say much the same. I enjoyed “Imajica” too, being lucky enough to get it in a single volume (which I later learned was pretty rare), but at 1136 pages I only managed to read it 2 or 3 times.
“Everville,” I read when it came out in my early-20s. I couldn’t *not* buy it of course, but being a bit more familiar with pop culture by then I was confident as identifying it as a slightly forced sequel. Which is not to say it’s bad per se, indeed it’s quite good actually, but as “The Great and Secret Show” felt—how to put it?—so *complete*, then it just felt like a messy addition which didn’t really add much. Which is ironic, because Barker claimed both were always planned as parts of a trilogy, with a third book coming eventually. (I have my strong doubts though—surely have written it decades ago.) By all means do still check it out if you enjoyed “The Great and Secret Show” as much as I did then, but if not then I wouldn’t make it a priority.
Other than that, I read “Galilee” with “Everville” because it came out at about the same time, but it’s very different, almost entirely lacking the magical and fantasy elements. I wasn’t impressed enough to read it a second time, the only one of Barker’s I haven’t so far. Maybe because it was an audiobook, which I’m not a fan of?
Anyway, thanks for passing on your thoughts about them. My copies are literally a couple of meters away from me as I type this, so naturally I’ve thought about trying them again over the last 20-30 years, but “Imajica”‘s length in particular had dissuaded me (surely I should slog through “The Count of Monte Cristo” and “War and Peace” first, I’ve always felt). I’m that bit closer to doing so now though, especially as your comments help me realize the difference all that time may have made. Cheers!
Hey,
Yeah, I too was nuts about The Great and Secret Show and Weaveworld as a high schooler. I don’t know why I never dug into the (now long-gone) copy of Everville that I had, but I know it sat on the shelf. Maybe I started reading it once or twice, but I never got sucked into it. I’m curious what I’d make of it—and the books I did read and enjoy—now, but I have enough other stuff on the shelf that I probably won’t go out of my way to read Everville for the moment.
I never read Galilee, but had a copy of Sacrament that I also never got around to reading. I believe it’s also non-speculative fiction, and I know I tried to get into it but never did. (It’s also long gone now.)
I haven’t read War and Peace (beyond excerpts) or The Count of Monte Cristo, but I have it on good authority that the latter is actually not a slog but rather a rollicking good time. It’s on my list of things that, damn it, I ought to read soon, though I haven’t yet picked up the Robin Buss translation, which apparently is the one to read (unless you want an abridged version).
Would love to hear what you think of the Barkers if you do check them out. I’m likeliest to look at Everville next, but not anytime soon.